Search for: "SHIRE US INC." Results 1 - 20 of 101
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2012, 8:27 pm by Patent Docs
Sandoz Inc. 1:12-cv-00040; filed January 6, 2012 in the District Court of Colorado • Plaintiffs: Shire LLC; Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Shire Development Inc.; Shire International Licensing B.V.; Amy F.T. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 3:45 pm by Patent Docs
Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al. 1:11-cv-00201; filed December 15, 2011 in the Northern District of West Virginia • Plaintiffs: Shire LLC; Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Shire Development Inc.; Shire International Licensing B. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 9:47 pm by Patent Docs
Shire LLC, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 8:45 pm by Patent Docs
Anchen Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al. 1:10-cv-00484; filed June 2, 2010 in the District Court of Delaware • Plaintiffs: Shire LLC; Supernus Pharmaceuticals Inc.; Amy F.T. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 8:01 am
Given the compression of competition due to the agreement, the FTC caught wind of the Shire-Barr-Impax agreement and opened an investigation in October 2006: “The US Federal Trade Commission (‘FTC’) informed Shire on October 3, 2006 that it was reviewing the ADDERALL XR patent litigation settlement agreement between Shire and Barr Laboratories, Inc. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 8:01 am
Given the compression of competition due to the agreement, the FTC caught wind of the Shire-Barr-Impax agreement and opened an investigation in October 2006: “The US Federal Trade Commission (‘FTC’) informed Shire on October 3, 2006 that it was reviewing the ADDERALL XR patent litigation settlement agreement between Shire and Barr Laboratories, Inc. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 11:31 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Shire contends that on the facts before us“Forest cannot be distinguished. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 6:34 am
"Shire has advised that, because the voluntary recall is not due to product safety issues, all Daytrana patches, including those in the lots subject to the recall, can continue to be used unless the release liner cannot be removed, or the patches are damaged while being opened," Noven said, in a statement.Link here. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 9:55 pm by Patent Docs
Shire Development, LLC et al. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 7:36 am by Dan Bressler
” “In his motion, Darken said Vinca’s current counsel have improperly used confidential emails from Barry A. [read post]